This is a hard book to describe, because it is a collection
of interviews of a cross-section of people who work for or are connected to
the Metropolitan Museum of Art in New York City. The museum first opened its doors in April of
1870. It has grown to be one of the world’s top museums,
spending millions on its collections and housing great treasures of past and
present civilizations. Out of around
2,000 people, Danziger interviewed 52.
The interviews were edited to appear as thoughtful monologues by each person,
with only a few observations by Danziger inserted at the beginning of each monologue. We read about each person's background, what their work is like, what it means to them, and so
forth.
One critic said in their review of the book that they could
decipher the absent questions by the flow of the text, but to me the monologues
flow smoothly and give just enough detail to keep the reader’s interest,
whether the person is recounting a personal tragedy or explaining the reasons
why Islamic Art is an “orphan art form” – how its civilizations crumbled and outsiders failed to engage with its principles and its interests, leaving it without an established place in the history of art.
All of the curators are amazing, in what they know and what
they have pursued, not for material gain (which point keeps resurfacing) but
for their passion regarding art, the objects and their creators. And similarly amazing are the people who do other things –
like the person manning the front desk for thirty years. His impressions of the visitors’ traits are
intriguing, like how the Brits tend to say ‘brilliant’ for emphasis, which he
finds amusing. And the waitress who has
a dying father who is going through invasive treatments with no respite, to whom
she can only say “I love you Daddy”. Yet
she separates her grief from her work, knowing that she’s there to help the museum visitors have a
perfect day. The
benefactor, the rich man who gives and gets others to give, is absolutely tenacious
in his pursuit of donations, yet you can feel his quiet
sense of character in his convictions.
He has no illusions about our being born generous. He says that people
have to be persuaded both by example, and by the idea that they can have a particular role in
preserving and cultivating the arts.
Ultimately
what comes across is how these people’s lives have been enriched by what they
do, with their contact with these buildings and this collection. There might be some hard feelings, but you
don’t hear of it. What you hear
primarily is how glad they are to work there, to be around the art, to arrive
each morning in the Great Hall. The now former director, Phillipe de
Montebello, says “I am the Met, the Met is me.” After 31 years as director,
that’s a wonderful statement. And to
varying degrees, that’s what you hear from all the others.
Click here to see the catalog listing.
Click here to see the catalog listing.
No comments:
Post a Comment